Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chesapeake City, Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 96
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chesapeake City, Virginia totaled $1,658,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lloyd A Murden Jr | Virginia Beach, VA 23456 | $9,466 |
22 | Wilbur Nicholas | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $9,240 |
23 | Michael W Mayo | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $8,649 |
24 | Oak Gone Farm LLC | Chesapeake, VA 23323 | $8,097 |
25 | George Winslow | Carrollton, VA 23314 | $6,789 |
26 | Michael E Hart | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $6,521 |
27 | Glenn Brunner | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $6,418 |
28 | Charlotte Boone | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $6,207 |
29 | Michael James Rama | Chesapeake, VA 23321 | $5,840 |
30 | Paul Pearce 2nd | Chesapeake, VA 23323 | $5,596 |
31 | John F Knowles Jr | South Mills, NC 27976 | $5,345 |
32 | L Wade Fulford | Stokes, NC 27884 | $5,104 |
33 | Grafton C Nicholas III | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $4,412 |
34 | F H Hildebrand | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $4,011 |
35 | Christopher Weatherly | Virginia Beach, VA 23456 | $3,957 |
36 | Margie Shirley | Virginia Beach, VA 23453 | $3,688 |
37 | J C Todd Jr | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $3,572 |
38 | Lela Chasten | Chesapeake, VA 23322 | $3,519 |
39 | Powel Farm Holdings LLC | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $3,504 |
40 | Rif Iv LLC | Bloomington, IL 61702 | $3,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”