Farm Subsidy information
Washington
Total Subsidies in Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 15,380
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington totaled $470,180,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $2,357,296 |
2 | Wheatland Bank ** | Davenport, WA 99122 | $1,814,827 |
3 | Smith Ranch-dale And Renee Smith Joint Venture | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $1,200,403 |
4 | Mistletoe Corporation | White Swan, WA 98952 | $1,026,680 |
5 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $1,015,748 |
6 | J & K Dairy LLC | Sunnyside, WA 98944 | $861,857 |
7 | Firewater Ranch Partnership | Moxee, WA 98936 | $859,372 |
8 | Wheatlife Farms Gp | Colfax, WA 99111 | $845,469 |
9 | First Interstate Bank ** | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $772,076 |
10 | Broughton Land Co | Dayton, WA 99328 | $765,869 |
11 | Norm Nelson Inc | Burlington, WA 98233 | $750,000 |
12 | Inaba Produce Farms Inc | Wapato, WA 98951 | $750,000 |
13 | Double R Hop Ranches Inc | Harrah, WA 98933 | $750,000 |
14 | Stahl Hutterian Brethren | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $742,800 |
15 | Stahl H B Trust | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $728,838 |
16 | Five D Farms LLC | Pasco, WA 99301 | $716,611 |
17 | S Martinez Livestock Inc | Moxee, WA 98936 | $708,437 |
18 | Warden Hutterian Brethren | Warden, WA 98857 | $706,800 |
19 | Whb Trust | Warden, WA 98857 | $706,725 |
20 | Norm Druffel & Sons Gp | Pullman, WA 99163 | $693,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>