Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Adams County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,221
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, Washington totaled $33,101,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Bow Tie Farms Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $97,314 |
42 | Century 2 Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $96,507 |
43 | Kap Production Joint Venture | Connell, WA 99326 | $95,193 |
44 | Blankenship Farms Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $92,228 |
45 | Kagele Farms Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $91,657 |
46 | Bar U Ranch Inc | Benge, WA 99105 | $89,930 |
47 | Walli Farms Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $88,862 |
48 | R. E. Kulm Farms Partnership | Lind, WA 99341 | $88,376 |
49 | Vickey T Inc | Moses Lake, WA 98837 | $87,258 |
50 | Jerry L Snyder | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $86,105 |
51 | S & J Farms Inc | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $85,145 |
52 | Schmidt Farms Inc | Odessa, WA 99159 | $84,548 |
53 | Crouse Farms Inc | Washtucna, WA 99371 | $83,395 |
54 | Lyle Prairie Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $83,388 |
55 | B & P Farms Inc | Lind, WA 99341 | $83,308 |
56 | Bench Orchard LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $82,283 |
57 | The Family Plow Inc | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $81,744 |
58 | C.l. Woodward Farm | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $81,566 |
59 | Dewald Farms Jv | Ritzville, WA 99169 | $80,997 |
60 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $80,824 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”