Total Commodity Programs in Clallam County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 102
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clallam County, Washington totaled $1,033,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | B&b Family Farm | Sequim, WA 98382 | $6,572 |
42 | Shannon D Cargo | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,979 |
43 | Vernon Soeneke Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,642 |
44 | Sequim Valley Farms Inc | Sequim, WA 98382 | $5,495 |
45 | Elizabeth Buckingham | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,208 |
46 | Quentin E Vitalis | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $5,009 |
47 | James M Halberg Weaver | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $4,891 |
48 | Gary L Peterson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $4,773 |
49 | Chestoqua Peterson | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $4,640 |
50 | Matthew T Chapman | Sequim, WA 98382 | $4,592 |
51 | Eric Bradley Adolphsen | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $4,350 |
52 | Michael Buckingham | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,442 |
53 | Roland A Gagnon Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $3,303 |
54 | Michael Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,957 |
55 | Jeanette Morningstarr Wiechman | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $2,841 |
56 | Neil Lyons Sr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,801 |
57 | Robert Whiteshield Jr | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,773 |
58 | Joseph A Daniels | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,766 |
59 | Christopher Lachester | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,543 |
60 | Anthony Lawrence | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $2,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”