Farm Subsidy information
Clallam County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Clallam County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 222
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clallam County, Washington totaled $4,752,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Leslie Bergman | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $10,204 |
62 | Ronald Bergman | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $10,203 |
63 | Jack Tatom | Sequim, WA 98382 | $10,180 |
64 | Anthony Darrell Boyd | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $10,161 |
65 | Laurence A Buzzell | Neah Bay, WA 98357 | $10,160 |
66 | Susan Clary | Sequim, WA 98382 | $10,035 |
67 | Joshua J Chapman | Sequim, WA 98382 | $9,862 |
68 | Raymond Hanson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $9,589 |
69 | Maple View Farm LLC | Sequim, WA 98382 | $9,287 |
70 | Conrad Eaton | Sequim, WA 98382 | $9,272 |
71 | Sadilek Farm LLC | Clallam Bay, WA 98326 | $9,159 |
72 | Arnold Robert Elofson | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $9,076 |
73 | Gerald Charles Jr | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $8,941 |
74 | James Bolstrom | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $8,941 |
75 | Steve Robideau | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $8,941 |
76 | Mike Schleufer | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $8,941 |
77 | Luke K Johnson | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $8,873 |
78 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $8,836 |
79 | Samual T Luce | Port Angeles, WA 98362 | $8,481 |
80 | Paul Aron Kaminski | Port Angeles, WA 98363 | $7,949 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”