Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Columbia County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 330
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Columbia County, Washington totaled $13,402,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Small Ranches Partnership | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $87,628 |
42 | Seney Farms J V | Starbuck, WA 99359 | $87,424 |
43 | Jack Gale Miller Inc | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $84,095 |
44 | Fred W Keller | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $83,790 |
45 | Miriam L Keller | Fall City, WA 98024 | $83,790 |
46 | Roger Gibbons | Dayton, WA 99328 | $82,501 |
47 | Covello Cellars Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $82,033 |
48 | Barjak Farms Inc | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $71,884 |
49 | Archer LLC | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $70,894 |
50 | Jackson Estate | Dayton, WA 99328 | $70,449 |
51 | Erwin Farms Jv | Prescott, WA 99348 | $68,283 |
52 | John J Mccaw | Waitsburg, WA 99361 | $68,254 |
53 | Bill B Poolman | Dayton, WA 99328 | $66,211 |
54 | Talbott Inc | Dayton, WA 99328 | $64,455 |
55 | Rennewanz Farms LLC | Vancouver, WA 98682 | $63,198 |
56 | Young Womens Christian Association | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $63,162 |
57 | Eaton Brothers | Dayton, WA 99328 | $63,158 |
58 | K-farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $61,868 |
59 | Paul Gibbons | Dayton, WA 99328 | $60,288 |
60 | Rose Gulch Farms Inc | Walla Walla, WA 99362 | $58,316 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”