Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Garfield County, Washington, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 32
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Garfield County, Washington totaled $108,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Claassen Ag Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,766 |
2 | 7 Jk Ranch Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $9,397 |
3 | Bjk Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $8,555 |
4 | Gw Farms Joint Venture | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $7,845 |
5 | Keatts Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $7,742 |
6 | Jim & Linda Mckeirnan | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $7,689 |
7 | J & T Koller Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $6,518 |
8 | , | $4,532 | |
9 | William P & Terrilie K Cox Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $4,524 |
10 | Nak Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $4,194 |
11 | Yale Farms | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $4,167 |
12 | Samantha J Charriere | Clarkston, WA 99403 | $3,913 |
13 | Benjamin James Dixon | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $3,673 |
14 | Scott Williams | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $3,659 |
15 | Four Aces Farms Partnership | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $3,327 |
16 | Norlinhills LLC | Grosse Pointe Farms, MI 48236 | $3,014 |
17 | H C Barr Family Trust | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $2,966 |
18 | Gwinn Family Trust Dated May 24 2013 | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $2,877 |
19 | R&r Cox Farms Inc | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $1,889 |
20 | Elsensohn Farms LLC | Issaquah, WA 98027 | $1,557 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>