Farm Subsidy information
Okanogan County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Okanogan County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 260
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Okanogan County, Washington totaled $16,667,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | George Wells Family Trust | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $49,012 |
42 | Marty Wick | Brewster, WA 98812 | $46,987 |
43 | Shirley Allemandi | Loomis, WA 98827 | $46,741 |
44 | Stennes Orchard Inc | Pateros, WA 98846 | $45,740 |
45 | Ronald R & Joy M Lewis Jv | Bridgeport, WA 98813 | $44,520 |
46 | Singh Orchards LLC | Brewster, WA 98812 | $43,304 |
47 | Gebbers Wick Orchards, Lp | Brewster, WA 98812 | $38,988 |
48 | Bstark LLC | Omak, WA 98841 | $36,961 |
49 | Paul Madden | Brewster, WA 98812 | $36,324 |
50 | Vic Stokes & Sons, Ptr | Twisp, WA 98856 | $35,128 |
51 | Crispin Ramirez Alvarez | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $34,726 |
52 | Hashknife Ranch, Inc | Winthrop, WA 98862 | $34,617 |
53 | Woodward Ranch, Inc | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $34,552 |
54 | Brian Earl Nelson | Oroville, WA 98844 | $31,593 |
55 | Diane Kenner | Spokane, WA 99202 | $30,306 |
56 | Nicholas T Root | Oroville, WA 98844 | $28,570 |
57 | Rios Orchard | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $28,419 |
58 | Loomis Orchard LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $27,701 |
59 | Tim Moomaw | Omak, WA 98841 | $26,010 |
60 | Juan Castrejon | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $25,988 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”