Farm Subsidy information
Okanogan County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Okanogan County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 260
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Okanogan County, Washington totaled $16,667,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Smith & Nelson Inc | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $81,978 |
22 | Craig Vejraska Family Limited Partnership | Omak, WA 98841 | $73,394 |
23 | Ellis-barnes Livestock | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $69,486 |
24 | Double J Ranch Inc | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $68,888 |
25 | Troy Acord | Twisp, WA 98856 | $66,519 |
26 | Raymond Dagnon | Loomis, WA 98827 | $65,600 |
27 | Edward J Cunningham | Shoreline, WA 98133 | $63,042 |
28 | Haeberle Ranch Inc | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $62,928 |
29 | Kenneth G Kramer | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $60,840 |
30 | Cascade Cherries LLC | Brewster, WA 98812 | $58,269 |
31 | Busy Bee Investments LLC | Oroville, WA 98844 | $57,416 |
32 | Scholz Ranch LLC | Tonasket, WA 98855 | $52,966 |
33 | Buckhorn Logging & Chipping, Ltd | Brewster, WA 98812 | $52,875 |
34 | Will Logging LLC | Loomis, WA 98827 | $52,875 |
35 | Silver-nickel Logging LLC | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $52,875 |
36 | Stoneridge Forestry LLC | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $52,875 |
37 | Ridgeline Forestry Llp | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $52,875 |
38 | Albert E Wilson | Riverside, WA 98849 | $52,605 |
39 | Dan D Tibbs | Oroville, WA 98844 | $49,527 |
40 | Highland Harvest Orchards LLC | Wenatchee, WA 98807 | $49,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”