Farm Subsidy information
Spokane County, Washington
Total Subsidies in Spokane County, Washington, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,111
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Spokane County, Washington totaled $274,779,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hames Family Farms Lp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,094,054 |
22 | Mike Clausen Ranch Jv | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,067,741 |
23 | Lowell C Schuman | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,057,828 |
24 | Janson Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $1,046,099 |
25 | Ken & Ida Clausen Jv | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $1,043,019 |
26 | Roecks Farms Inc | Worley, ID 83876 | $1,031,209 |
27 | Coulee Creek Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $1,028,776 |
28 | Cornmesser Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $1,021,660 |
29 | Goose Flats Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $1,019,103 |
30 | Constantin E Petropoulos | Spokane, WA 99219 | $1,011,246 |
31 | Sievers Farm LLC | Spangle, WA 99031 | $1,011,087 |
32 | D & M Farms Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $989,451 |
33 | Bafus Bros Gp | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $977,365 |
34 | Mcgourin Farms Inc | Spangle, WA 99031 | $969,041 |
35 | Green View Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $936,398 |
36 | Wernz Farming LLC | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $936,090 |
37 | Lawrence D Gady | Rockford, WA 99030 | $936,069 |
38 | Wilscot Farms Inc | Reardan, WA 99029 | $910,840 |
39 | Hangman Creek Products Lp | Latah, WA 99018 | $901,220 |
40 | Mark Hauschild | Spokane, WA 99217 | $878,410 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”