Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Whitman County, Washington, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 110
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Whitman County, Washington totaled $506,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lautenschlager & Sons Gp | Endicott, WA 99125 | $5,742 |
22 | Gregory A Stout | Uniontown, WA 99179 | $5,546 |
23 | Richard W Nelson | Colfax, WA 99111 | $4,578 |
24 | Jay Allert | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $4,215 |
25 | D & M Lange Jv | Pullman, WA 99163 | $4,054 |
26 | Rocking Arrow Ranch Inc | Endicott, WA 99125 | $4,042 |
27 | Wyatt Van Tine | Saint John, WA 99171 | $3,934 |
28 | Lazy J-c Cattle Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $3,207 |
29 | J B K Farms Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $3,078 |
30 | Shirley Ann Melville | Lamont, WA 99017 | $3,071 |
31 | Al Bruns | Palouse, WA 99161 | $2,973 |
32 | Logen Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $2,948 |
33 | Cox Land & Livestock Inc | Hay, WA 99136 | $2,863 |
34 | J Aune & Sons Gp | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,698 |
35 | Justin Heaton | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,552 |
36 | Andrew J Shields | Lamont, WA 99017 | $2,376 |
37 | 7001 Big Alkali Road Inc | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,242 |
38 | Thomas A Simpson | Saint John, WA 99171 | $2,224 |
39 | Rock Valley Ranch Inc | Saint John, WA 99171 | $2,203 |
40 | Stephen M Maki | Lacrosse, WA 99143 | $2,177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”