Conservation Reserve Program in Grant County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 96
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Grant County, West Virginia totaled $4,155,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Herb Kimble | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $32,862 |
42 | Jonathan R Kuhn | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $32,540 |
43 | William E Signor III | New Creek, WV 26743 | $31,987 |
44 | High Point Farms | Maysville, WV 26833 | $30,169 |
45 | Apex Farms | Lahmansville, WV 26731 | $29,918 |
46 | John H Waddy | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $29,477 |
47 | Patricia Lou Krokus Irrevocable Trust | Maysville, WV 26833 | $28,944 |
48 | Bruce Hyre Jr | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $28,475 |
49 | George Thorne | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $27,103 |
50 | Adam N Goldizen | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $27,033 |
51 | Sarah Taylor-goldizen | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $27,033 |
52 | Grover Duling | Keyser, WV 26726 | $26,022 |
53 | Paul Kuykendall | Maysville, WV 26833 | $24,348 |
54 | Ronald Brent Berg | Maysville, WV 26833 | $24,092 |
55 | Rodney Turner | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $23,157 |
56 | Sterl Berg | Maysville, WV 26833 | $22,554 |
57 | Terry L Weese | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $22,499 |
58 | Vernon Clark | Maysville, WV 26833 | $22,479 |
59 | New Creek Mt Sportsman Club Inc | Fort Ashby, WV 26719 | $20,342 |
60 | Steven A Goldizen | New Creek, WV 26743 | $19,892 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”