Deficiency Payment in Jefferson County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Jefferson County, West Virginia totaled $336,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gilbert P Wright Jr | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $5,396 |
22 | Virginia F Burns | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $4,983 |
23 | R Michael Magaha | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $4,801 |
24 | Mary R Hetzel | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $4,345 |
25 | Abelow Farms | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $4,218 |
26 | Robert L Brady | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $4,060 |
27 | Jack W Catrow Jr | Shenandoah Junction, WV 25442 | $4,009 |
28 | Shady Grove Farm LLC | Rippon, WV 25441 | $3,956 |
29 | Locust Grove Farm Inc | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $3,919 |
30 | T L Magaha & Sons Inc | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $3,400 |
31 | Joseph A Ware Jr | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $3,198 |
32 | Tom Lipscomb | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $3,141 |
33 | Robert S Butler | Martinsburg, WV 25401 | $3,123 |
34 | Donald L Ott | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $3,059 |
35 | Green Hill Farm Inc | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $2,906 |
36 | John Paul Laycock | Kearneysville, WV 25430 | $2,764 |
37 | Wysong Brothers | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $2,660 |
38 | Emmett R Boyd Est | Charles Town, WV 25414 | $2,516 |
39 | Charles W Fulk Jr | Charlottesville, VA 22901 | $2,509 |
40 | Aspen Pool Farm Inc | Shepherdstown, WV 25443 | $2,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”