Farm Subsidy information
Monroe County, West Virginia
Total Subsidies in Monroe County, West Virginia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 935
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Monroe County, West Virginia totaled $12,672,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Boggess Dairy Inc | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $605,249 |
2 | Timothy A Hoke | Sinks Grove, WV 24976 | $439,761 |
3 | Larry D Echols | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $294,806 |
4 | Jeffrey Walker - Locust Lane Farm | Union, WV 24983 | $201,853 |
5 | Pond Oak Dairy | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $185,140 |
6 | Walnut Ridge Dairy Inc | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $182,205 |
7 | Barry G Booth | Peterstown, WV 24963 | $168,896 |
8 | Pleasant Valley Farm | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $142,374 |
9 | Thomas Karnes - Kk Farms | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $141,104 |
10 | Wilbur Larew | Greenville, WV 24945 | $140,895 |
11 | William C Level | Ronceverte, WV 24970 | $133,658 |
12 | Aaron K Helmick | Greenville, WV 24945 | $131,297 |
13 | C Scott Thornton | Lindside, WV 24951 | $127,154 |
14 | Belle Vue Dairy | Union, WV 24983 | $125,656 |
15 | Kitchen Creek Dairy | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $120,857 |
16 | Steve Echols | Union, WV 24983 | $119,776 |
17 | Windspring Farms Inc | Gap Mills, WV 24941 | $116,876 |
18 | Thomas Booth | Lindside, WV 24951 | $114,188 |
19 | Faw Valley Farm | Union, WV 24983 | $109,180 |
20 | David L Atkins | Union, WV 24983 | $108,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>