Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pendleton County, West Virginia, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 44
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pendleton County, West Virginia totaled $84,854 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Conrad Farms Incorporated | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $24,226 |
2 | Deans Gap Farm, LLC | Fort Seybert, WV 26802 | $11,917 |
3 | Bernice O Hedrick | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $10,615 |
4 | Pamela S Waggy | Brandywine, WV 26802 | $7,449 |
5 | Edith L Hedrick | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $7,442 |
6 | Heavner Farms LLC | Upper Tract, WV 26866 | $5,785 |
7 | Wanda Harman | Petersburg, WV 26847 | $1,661 |
8 | Cynthia B Yokum - B & Y Farms | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $1,561 |
9 | Luci J Raines | Circleville, WV 26804 | $1,130 |
10 | Charlotte R Hoover | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $1,011 |
11 | Doris M Huffman | Franklin, WV 26807 | $882 |
12 | Lois K Carr | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $760 |
13 | Thomas William Wimer | Franklin, WV 26807 | $722 |
14 | Naomi Ruth Nelson | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $701 |
15 | Cathy Diane Mcmorrow | Seneca Rocks, WV 26884 | $661 |
16 | Meadow Springs LLC | Franklin, WV 26807 | $660 |
17 | Audra Mae Arbogast | Circleville, WV 26804 | $593 |
18 | Jean Wimer | Riverton, WV 26814 | $545 |
19 | Teresa Heavner | Franklin, WV 26807 | $524 |
20 | Arlene Botkin | Sugar Grove, WV 26815 | $512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>