Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 30,677
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Wisconsin totaled $522,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dane County Growers Ptrn | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $906,817 |
2 | Russell Brothers Farms | Shullsburg, WI 53586 | $768,440 |
3 | Rossi Grain Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $723,419 |
4 | Crapp Farms Partnership | Lancaster, WI 53813 | $703,288 |
5 | Zahn Farms Cropping | Gillett, WI 54124 | $690,332 |
6 | Oneida Nation | Seymour, WI 54165 | $683,292 |
7 | Jacobs Brothers | De Pere, WI 54115 | $634,014 |
8 | D & S Farms | Gratiot, WI 53541 | $600,696 |
9 | Christiana Farms | Cambridge, WI 53523 | $600,560 |
10 | Weeks Farms Partners | Sharon, WI 53585 | $593,927 |
11 | R & C Hawkins Farms | Bristol, WI 53104 | $592,634 |
12 | Reu Farms | Fort Atkinson, WI 53538 | $575,084 |
13 | Wilks Brothers | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $557,431 |
14 | Sayre Farm Operations | Edgerton, WI 53534 | $535,742 |
15 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $524,853 |
16 | Blue Star Dairy Farms Partnership | De Forest, WI 53532 | $507,970 |
17 | Bolton Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $494,561 |
18 | Roche Grain | Columbus, WI 53925 | $483,235 |
19 | Noble Grain Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $470,078 |
20 | Schaefer Grain | Platteville, WI 53818 | $464,116 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>