Commodity Certificates in Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 132
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Wisconsin totaled $2,950,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | B J Lapacinski And Sons Inc | Rice Lake, WI 54868 | $40,525 |
22 | Arndt Farms Inc | Janesville, WI 53546 | $39,540 |
23 | Djtw Farms LLC | Marshall, WI 53559 | $37,526 |
24 | Ms Real Estate Holdings LLC | Freedom, WI 54130 | $36,504 |
25 | Jeff Spensley | Belmont, WI 53510 | $35,591 |
26 | Larson Acres Inc | Evansville, WI 53536 | $33,910 |
27 | Holst Farms Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $33,883 |
28 | Metcalf Farms | Janesville, WI 53546 | $33,683 |
29 | Fenwick Farms Inc | Brodhead, WI 53520 | $32,290 |
30 | Fetzer Farms Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $29,321 |
31 | Van Dyk Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $29,132 |
32 | Maple Leaf Dairy Inc | Cleveland, WI 53015 | $28,505 |
33 | Wagenson Farms Llp | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $27,742 |
34 | Hanerville Acres Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $27,192 |
35 | Ter Rae Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $26,871 |
36 | Joseph J Statz | Marshall, WI 53559 | $26,251 |
37 | Troy Statz | Marshall, WI 53559 | $26,251 |
38 | Lentz Farms Inc | Ridgeland, WI 54763 | $26,024 |
39 | Thunderbranch Acres Inc | Darlington, WI 53530 | $25,938 |
40 | Sedelbauer Farms Inc | Hixton, WI 54635 | $25,596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”