Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Adams County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 92
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Adams County, Wisconsin totaled $812,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Loren L Kaye | Friendship, WI 53934 | $9,451 |
22 | Charles Arthur Church | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $8,805 |
23 | Jon S Thome | Oxford, WI 53952 | $8,686 |
24 | Nichols Enterprises Inc | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $8,330 |
25 | Hugh D Mcgowan | Oxford, WI 53952 | $8,246 |
26 | James E Bays II | Adams, WI 53910 | $7,886 |
27 | Cloverview Farms | Oxford, WI 53952 | $7,526 |
28 | Daniel R Grabarski | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $7,436 |
29 | Seis Family Farms LLC | Grand Marsh, WI 53936 | $6,657 |
30 | Bernardo Calo | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $6,610 |
31 | Cran Cattle LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $6,325 |
32 | Nathan E Bula | Oxford, WI 53952 | $6,215 |
33 | Edward Volkening | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $6,138 |
34 | Bruce Marti | Friendship, WI 53934 | $6,058 |
35 | Harmony Ag LLC | Friendship, WI 53934 | $5,916 |
36 | Bartsch Farms | Hancock, WI 54943 | $5,880 |
37 | J Kay Olson | Friendship, WI 53934 | $5,589 |
38 | Dennis Erickson | Arkdale, WI 54613 | $5,566 |
39 | Roland Jensen | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $5,326 |
40 | Christopher Van Beek | Mauston, WI 53948 | $4,689 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”