Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Brown County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 56
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Brown County, Wisconsin totaled $385,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel J Vander Heiden | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $5,900 |
22 | Dennis J Stodola | Luxemburg, WI 54217 | $5,797 |
23 | Paul A Lemke | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $5,486 |
24 | Plum Pride Holsteins LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $5,405 |
25 | Eugene Micke | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,283 |
26 | Robert Erdmann | De Pere, WI 54115 | $5,154 |
27 | Brickstead Dairy LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $4,400 |
28 | Diny Veal Beef And Elk LLC | Greenleaf, WI 54126 | $4,134 |
29 | Diederich Farm | De Pere, WI 54115 | $4,076 |
30 | Pleasant View Beef And Dairy | Oneida, WI 54155 | $4,011 |
31 | Mary Jane Herrmann | Green Bay, WI 54311 | $4,000 |
32 | Richard Herrmann Jr | Green Bay, WI 54311 | $4,000 |
33 | Robertson Brothers LLC/dl | De Pere, WI 54115 | $3,803 |
34 | William J Bogucki | Pulaski, WI 54162 | $3,680 |
35 | Van Wychen Farms | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $3,488 |
36 | Meadowlark Dairy LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $3,269 |
37 | Robertson Brothers Dairy Farm LLC | De Pere, WI 54115 | $3,182 |
38 | Paul A Van Gheem | De Pere, WI 54115 | $2,634 |
39 | Ronald Williams | Suamico, WI 54313 | $2,538 |
40 | Kent And Sandra Petersen | Denmark, WI 54208 | $2,355 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”