Farm Subsidy information
Calumet County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 466
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $10,574,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mitchell Schaefer | Chilton, WI 53014 | $71,073 |
42 | Nathan Schnell | Brillion, WI 54110 | $69,822 |
43 | Jenlar Holsteins And Brown Swiss LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $69,225 |
44 | Pfister Farms LLC | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $64,131 |
45 | Keith Nettekoven | Menasha, WI 54952 | $62,920 |
46 | David E Hintz | Brillion, WI 54110 | $62,423 |
47 | Brookside Dairy Farm LLC | Menasha, WI 54952 | $59,285 |
48 | Krueger Century Farms LLC | Brillion, WI 54110 | $58,498 |
49 | Jonathan P Dietzen | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $58,141 |
50 | Kesler Farms LLC | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $51,431 |
51 | Kolbe Farms LLC | Chilton, WI 53014 | $50,952 |
52 | Schneider Farms Inc | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $50,725 |
53 | Kenneth A Mader | Menasha, WI 54952 | $49,021 |
54 | Dallmann Farms Inc | Brillion, WI 54110 | $48,058 |
55 | Adam P Faust | Chilton, WI 53014 | $47,924 |
56 | Schneider Farms Real Estate | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $47,852 |
57 | Ronald H Faber | Chilton, WI 53014 | $47,328 |
58 | D & J Dairy Inc | Chilton, WI 53014 | $45,193 |
59 | Christopher J Tasch | Chilton, WI 53014 | $44,683 |
60 | Kesler Farms | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $43,890 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”