Conservation Reserve Program in Calumet County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 189
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Calumet County, Wisconsin totaled $2,911,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bruce Keller | Brillion, WI 54110 | $189,935 |
2 | John S Schwarz | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $104,522 |
3 | Douglas Prange | Elkhart Lake, WI 53020 | $72,853 |
4 | Leona Sattell | Greendale, WI 53129 | $72,070 |
5 | Harvey Hephner | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $71,764 |
6 | Winnebago East Shore Conservation | Chilton, WI 53014 | $69,816 |
7 | Carl Daun | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $67,841 |
8 | Thomas J Laughrin | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $59,243 |
9 | Dwight Boettcher | Hilbert, WI 54129 | $59,175 |
10 | Herman Hartmann | Chilton, WI 53014 | $58,306 |
11 | Walter Marcheske | Menasha, WI 54952 | $55,958 |
12 | Jane Kores | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $50,459 |
13 | Gervase Hephner | Chilton, WI 53014 | $49,976 |
14 | Randolph Schmitt | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $47,268 |
15 | Charles Sabel | Chilton, WI 53014 | $45,456 |
16 | Hansen Farm | Deerfield, WI 53531 | $45,171 |
17 | Dennis J Roehrig | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $44,059 |
18 | Ruby Gerner | Chilton, WI 53014 | $43,340 |
19 | Joseph R Weidensee | New Holstein, WI 53061 | $42,570 |
20 | Theresa Madson | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $39,609 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>