Market Loss Assistance Program in Columbia County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,277
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Columbia County, Wisconsin totaled $16,913,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas H Klahn | Lodi, WI 53555 | $70,276 |
42 | Judith A Klahn | Lodi, WI 53555 | $70,275 |
43 | Charles R Becker | Pardeeville, WI 53954 | $66,243 |
44 | Paulsoncrest Farms Ptnshp | Columbus, WI 53925 | $65,996 |
45 | Catherine Herrmann | Columbus, WI 53925 | $65,767 |
46 | Dennis W Wopat & Debra L Healy Wopat Jt Rev Trust | Rio, WI 53960 | $65,209 |
47 | Sanderson Prairie Farms Inc | Pardeeville, WI 53954 | $63,831 |
48 | Tim E Brandsma | Cambria, WI 53923 | $63,743 |
49 | H L M Farms Inc | Lodi, WI 53555 | $62,547 |
50 | Manke Seed & Livestock Inc | Arlington, WI 53911 | $60,936 |
51 | Howard G Hartmann | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $60,571 |
52 | Siewert Farms Inc | Dalton, WI 53926 | $60,161 |
53 | Dowdell Farms | Poynette, WI 53955 | $59,562 |
54 | Dean Manthe | De Forest, WI 53532 | $59,015 |
55 | Phillip Pines | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $58,491 |
56 | Lowell T Hoffmann | Cambria, WI 53923 | $58,339 |
57 | Donald P Nelson | Wisconsin Dells, WI 53965 | $57,954 |
58 | Rick Yelk | Columbus, WI 53925 | $57,471 |
59 | Bussian Inc | Deforest, WI 53532 | $56,440 |
60 | David C Endres Living Trust Dated | Lodi, WI 53555 | $56,140 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”