Deficiency Payment in Dane County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,328
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Dane County, Wisconsin totaled $5,303,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Donald Barman Sr | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $18,717 |
42 | Bradley Farms Inc | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $18,606 |
43 | R & G Miller & Sons Inc | Columbus, WI 53925 | $18,103 |
44 | Gregory Ziegler | Middleton, WI 53562 | $18,055 |
45 | Furseth Farms Inc | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $17,719 |
46 | Giles F Gobel | Brooklyn, WI 53521 | $17,494 |
47 | Stephen - Hoffman Li J Hoffman | Sun Prairie, WI 53590 | $17,437 |
48 | T Waddell & Sons Inc | Marshall, WI 53559 | $17,302 |
49 | James E Treinen | Deforest, WI 53532 | $17,237 |
50 | Dennis R Kelley | Arlington, WI 53911 | $17,177 |
51 | Philip & Carol Peterson Rev Tr | Oregon, WI 53575 | $16,838 |
52 | Dennis R Vike | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $16,817 |
53 | Rolf S Forshaug | Black Earth, WI 53515 | $16,537 |
54 | Arlington Livestock Inc | Dane, WI 53529 | $16,397 |
55 | Patricia Fosdal | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $16,095 |
56 | Myron Fosdal | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $16,093 |
57 | Wagner Milky Way Prtn | Waunakee, WI 53597 | $15,982 |
58 | Kevin D Hanson | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $15,891 |
59 | James Skaar | Cottage Grove, WI 53527 | $15,887 |
60 | M & W Olson Ptrn | Stoughton, WI 53589 | $15,792 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”