Total Commodity Programs in Dunn County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,855
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dunn County, Wisconsin totaled $164,704,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Patrick Auth And Sons Inc | Arkansaw, WI 54721 | $1,120,842 |
22 | Ronald G Weisenbeck | Eau Galle, WI 54737 | $1,084,654 |
23 | Michael S Nelson | New Auburn, WI 54757 | $1,072,413 |
24 | William E Ockler | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $1,003,649 |
25 | Prestrud Dairy LLC | Prairie Farm, WI 54762 | $1,002,666 |
26 | Maple Leaf Acres, Inc | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $965,768 |
27 | Luther Grohn | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $962,109 |
28 | Cabin Hill Dairy | Boyceville, WI 54725 | $941,536 |
29 | Virginia Grohn | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $920,378 |
30 | Clark Ridge Farm Inc | Boyceville, WI 54725 | $896,601 |
31 | Robert E Kraemer | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $891,554 |
32 | Lentz Farms Inc | Ridgeland, WI 54763 | $887,367 |
33 | Michael R Prochnow | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $881,357 |
34 | Rusk Prairie Farms | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $879,685 |
35 | Hy-ridge Holsteins, LLC | Ridgeland, WI 54763 | $867,004 |
36 | Melody Pines Farm, Inc. | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $865,451 |
37 | Allen Klatt | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $851,581 |
38 | Pleasant Valley Farms | Menomonie, WI 54751 | $851,468 |
39 | Five Star Dairy LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $833,085 |
40 | Larson Agventures LLC | Elk Mound, WI 54739 | $813,017 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”