Farm Subsidy information
Eau Claire County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,486
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Eau Claire County, Wisconsin totaled $140,197,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Timothy J Hager | Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 | $560,748 |
22 | Leila M Bernard | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $517,090 |
23 | Richard Brown | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $510,702 |
24 | Robert I Stensen | Augusta, WI 54722 | $505,104 |
25 | Geske Farms | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $492,840 |
26 | James E Volbrecht | Eau Claire, WI 54703 | $479,408 |
27 | Lance Wier | Osseo, WI 54758 | $478,916 |
28 | Daniel Von Haden | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $459,919 |
29 | Carol Schaffer | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $439,339 |
30 | Troy P Gilbertson | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $428,288 |
31 | Carl Knudtson | Fall Creek, WI 54742 | $427,614 |
32 | Daniel R Boettcher | Fairchild, WI 54741 | $421,863 |
33 | Douglas L Nelson | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $420,114 |
34 | Leland Christenson II | Eleva, WI 54738 | $419,884 |
35 | Gregory Stanek | Augusta, WI 54722 | $419,417 |
36 | Damar Farms | Strum, WI 54770 | $405,233 |
37 | Joseph P Matz | Strum, WI 54770 | $404,043 |
38 | Charles O Fremstad | Osseo, WI 54758 | $403,448 |
39 | Lloyd Peters | Eleva, WI 54738 | $395,286 |
40 | Valley View Acres Llp | Eleva, WI 54738 | $383,142 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”