Production Flexibility Program in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,537
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Fond Du Lac County, Wisconsin totaled $22,691,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ever Green Growers Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $281,064 |
2 | Brey & Meilahn | Pickett, WI 54964 | $277,227 |
3 | Prairie Rock Farms | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $270,860 |
4 | Edward H Montsma | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $247,629 |
5 | Rose-eld Farms Inc | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $225,584 |
6 | Fenner Farms | Ripon, WI 54971 | $216,916 |
7 | Willis Bros Farm Partnership Llp | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $216,478 |
8 | Shafer's Acres | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $209,091 |
9 | Spergers Bona Vita Farms | Waupun, WI 53963 | $187,830 |
10 | Rickland Farms Inc | Eldorado, WI 54932 | $182,376 |
11 | Ronald Goeden | Ripon, WI 54971 | $180,069 |
12 | David Marchant | Rosendale, WI 54974 | $176,581 |
13 | Phillip Majerus | Lomira, WI 53048 | $176,361 |
14 | Gerald Schulz Farms Inc | Ripon, WI 54971 | $169,177 |
15 | Spirit Enterprise Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54936 | $156,380 |
16 | William Bartz | Pickett, WI 54964 | $152,942 |
17 | Keith D Krohn | Brandon, WI 53919 | $145,262 |
18 | Cottonwood Creek Farms Inc | Fond Du Lac, WI 54937 | $134,033 |
19 | Pinch Farms Inc | Brandon, WI 53919 | $131,172 |
20 | David C Schultz | Van Dyne, WI 54979 | $130,564 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>