Total Conservation Programs in Iowa County, Wisconsin, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 582

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Iowa County, Wisconsin totaled $4,057,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2022
1Iowa County Rec & Prairie Restoration LtdMineral Point, WI 53565$50,000
2Greg J OimoenBlue Mounds, WI 53517$49,894
3Larry L SteffesMineral Point, WI 53565$49,876
4Stracka Family Farm TrustMineral Point, WI 53565$49,852
5Driftless Area Land ConservancyDodgeville, WI 53533$49,126
6Erdman Future II LLCMadison, WI 53705$46,137
7Erdman Wisconsin Properties LLCMadison, WI 53705$45,569
8Andrew A LeutholdMineral Point, WI 53565$42,691
9James K McgrawBarneveld, WI 53507$42,191
10L F L LLCDodgeville, WI 53533$41,839
11James W JohnsonRidgeway, WI 53582$40,647
12Patrick R McgrawDodgeville, WI 53533$40,026
13Thomas A McgrawDodgeville, WI 53533$39,377
14The Prairie Enthusiasts IncVerona, WI 53593$39,179
15Gary D LangfossHollandale, WI 53544$38,173
16Tabitha May SteffesMineral Point, WI 53565$35,930
17James L Heisner And Jane P Heisner Irrevocable TruMineral Point, WI 53565$34,028
18Howard M WilsonMineral Point, WI 53565$33,437
19The Robin R. Gilbertson And Kaye D. Gilbertson RevBarneveld, WI 53507$32,511
20Annette M PerkinsMineral Point, WI 53565$32,451

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag