Farm Subsidy information
Kenosha County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 203
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $4,212,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terry Brothers Grain Farm LLC | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $16,321 |
42 | Crane Grain Farms LLC | Salem, WI 53168 | $15,342 |
43 | Keith Wilson | Burlington, WI 53105 | $15,157 |
44 | Weis-way Dairy LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $14,636 |
45 | William Neuhaus | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $14,360 |
46 | Daniels Dairy II | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $14,133 |
47 | Bart Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $13,822 |
48 | Leonard A Lois Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $12,710 |
49 | Meyer Family Farm | Bristol, WI 53104 | $12,569 |
50 | Wayne C Wisnefski | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $11,964 |
51 | Allan R Zirbel | Salem, WI 53168 | $11,812 |
52 | Rossi Farms Inc | Bristol, WI 53104 | $11,590 |
53 | J. Smith Farms, Inc | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $11,499 |
54 | Jeffrey Badtke | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $11,233 |
55 | Edward Fliess | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $10,711 |
56 | Tim Lois | Burlington, WI 53105 | $9,862 |
57 | Marcus Timothy Lois | Burlington, WI 53105 | $9,862 |
58 | Gary Nelson Farms Inc | Blue River, WI 53518 | $9,679 |
59 | Robert F Fliess Jr | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $9,311 |
60 | Emil M Mravec Revocable Trust Dated 4-15-2009 | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $9,092 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”