Total Commodity Programs in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 582
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $66,914,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas W Fliess Jr | Franksville, WI 53126 | $426,213 |
42 | Production Unlimited LLC | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $409,638 |
43 | John P Steinbrink | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $401,810 |
44 | Uhlenhake's Land Locked Acres LLC | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $374,675 |
45 | Patrick Willkomm | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $366,702 |
46 | Dale Spoerlein | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $352,881 |
47 | Richard N Spoerlein | Salem, WI 53168 | $351,619 |
48 | Glenn E Fenske | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $344,913 |
49 | David A Kirchner | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $337,360 |
50 | Wilks Brothers | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $334,918 |
51 | Jerome N Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $319,128 |
52 | Thomas W Coughlin | Sturtevant, WI 53177 | $318,901 |
53 | Keith Drissel | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $313,547 |
54 | Mark J Weis | Burlington, WI 53105 | $313,057 |
55 | Marvin Drissel | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $309,486 |
56 | Norbert Fliess | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $291,619 |
57 | Dale W Elfering | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $288,350 |
58 | Crane Grain | Burlington, WI 53105 | $285,612 |
59 | Gerou Farms LLC | Waterford, WI 53185 | $271,762 |
60 | Pats Services Inc | New Munster, WI 53152 | $260,067 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”