Deficiency Payment in Kenosha County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 183
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Kenosha County, Wisconsin totaled $857,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John B Herda | Burlington, WI 53105 | $11,831 |
22 | Brent Nelson | Kenosha, WI 53142 | $11,724 |
23 | Daniels Dairy II | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $11,165 |
24 | Robert P Fliess | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $11,117 |
25 | Emil M Mravec Revocable Trust Dated 4-15-2009 | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $11,111 |
26 | Lois Bros | Burlington, WI 53105 | $11,002 |
27 | Holloway Heritage Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $10,344 |
28 | Leland & Bernelda Stohr Revocable | Twin Lakes, WI 53181 | $10,342 |
29 | Edward Edquist | Kenosha, WI 53144 | $9,816 |
30 | John Kevek | Pleasant Prairie, WI 53158 | $8,786 |
31 | Leonard A Lois Jr | Burlington, WI 53105 | $8,564 |
32 | Mark J Weis | Burlington, WI 53105 | $8,199 |
33 | Wayne C Wisnefski | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $7,915 |
34 | Hi Line Haven Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $7,879 |
35 | Wayne Kaddatz | Burlington, WI 53105 | $7,676 |
36 | Wilfred & Constance Meier Rev Tr | Bristol, WI 53104 | $7,037 |
37 | Hawkins Farms Inc | Bristol, WI 53104 | $6,426 |
38 | Paul B Jaeger | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $6,270 |
39 | Paul Dunteman | Addison, IL 60101 | $6,206 |
40 | Wilson Farm | Burlington, WI 53105 | $6,166 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”