Farm Subsidy information
Marquette County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Marquette County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marquette County, Wisconsin totaled $85,782,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Donald Buchholz | Westfield, WI 53964 | $583,335 |
22 | Kemridge Farm 2 Inc | Westfield, WI 53964 | $566,599 |
23 | Westmont Farms LLC | Montello, WI 53949 | $547,983 |
24 | Dennis R Fenner | Neshkoro, WI 54960 | $515,526 |
25 | Thomas C Lyon | Westfield, WI 53964 | $506,552 |
26 | Gregory Lawrence Lindner | Oxford, WI 53952 | $494,009 |
27 | Buck-a-way Acres LLC | Montello, WI 53949 | $441,417 |
28 | Larry Dean Moll | Dalton, WI 53926 | $416,551 |
29 | Soda Farms | Princeton, WI 54968 | $410,219 |
30 | Richard A Marotz | Westfield, WI 53964 | $383,627 |
31 | Robnco Inc | Chetek, WI 54728 | $382,776 |
32 | Paul Harvey | Princeton, WI 54968 | $356,386 |
33 | Bruchs Farms Inc | Oxford, WI 53952 | $338,320 |
34 | Flyte Family Farms LLC | Coloma, WI 54930 | $329,635 |
35 | Sleepy Hollow Farms | Montello, WI 53949 | $321,952 |
36 | Sparkling Springs Stock Farm | Montello, WI 53949 | $314,358 |
37 | Gerbitz Idle Hour Hog Farm | Briggsville, WI 53920 | $309,682 |
38 | Soda Farms LLC | Princeton, WI 54968 | $302,448 |
39 | Neal Allan Turner | Portage, WI 53901 | $300,551 |
40 | Paul S Dahlke | Montello, WI 53949 | $292,623 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”