Farm Subsidy information
Marquette County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Marquette County, Wisconsin, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 175
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marquette County, Wisconsin totaled $4,774,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daniel M Cummings | Westfield, WI 53964 | $38,179 |
22 | Flyte Family Farms LLC | Coloma, WI 54930 | $33,138 |
23 | Bradley Clinton Kolpin II | Westfield, WI 53964 | $32,841 |
24 | Daniel Luke Thome | Endeavor, WI 53930 | $30,450 |
25 | Crystal Farms Inc | Montello, WI 53949 | $28,108 |
26 | K-t Enterprises Inc Of Westfield | Westfield, WI 53964 | $28,076 |
27 | Michael D Moll | Dalton, WI 53926 | $26,081 |
28 | Ronald R Ledvina | Princeton, WI 54968 | $25,626 |
29 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $25,048 |
30 | Donald G Bittelman | Westfield, WI 53964 | $25,019 |
31 | Hockerman Bros Inc | Westfield, WI 53964 | $23,395 |
32 | Westmont Farms LLC | Montello, WI 53949 | $21,990 |
33 | Kenneth J Borzick | Montello, WI 53949 | $19,317 |
34 | James Donald Buchholz | Westfield, WI 53964 | $18,591 |
35 | Hillmer Farms | Montello, WI 53949 | $18,488 |
36 | John E Welke | Montello, WI 53949 | $16,437 |
37 | Paul S Dahlke | Montello, WI 53949 | $16,129 |
38 | Almon Edward Klapoetke | Montello, WI 53949 | $15,402 |
39 | Ricky Frozene | Westfield, WI 53964 | $15,256 |
40 | Dennis L Seeliger | Princeton, WI 54968 | $14,789 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”