Deficiency Payment in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 504
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $1,312,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Arnold J Pechacek | River Falls, WI 54022 | $6,973 |
42 | Kenneth D Langer | Prescott, WI 54021 | $6,383 |
43 | Christiansens Dairy Inc | Hager City, WI 54014 | $6,378 |
44 | Brian W Girdeen | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $6,247 |
45 | William L Most | Prescott, WI 54021 | $6,236 |
46 | Ralph R Matzek | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $6,096 |
47 | O'neil Farms Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $6,087 |
48 | Paul A Frandsen | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $6,047 |
49 | Fetzer Farms Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $6,013 |
50 | Mosts Sunny Acres Farms Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $5,822 |
51 | Blue Goose Farms Inc | Plum City, WI 54761 | $5,671 |
52 | Hines Farms Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $5,646 |
53 | Vivienne C Hoikka | Prescott, WI 54021 | $5,585 |
54 | Robert Huppert-estate | River Falls, WI 54022 | $5,567 |
55 | Trim-bel Valley Farms Ptr | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $5,562 |
56 | Paul D Nielsen | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $5,529 |
57 | Delmont R Hague | Hager City, WI 54014 | $5,511 |
58 | Most Holsteins Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $5,490 |
59 | Hager Farms | Bay City, WI 54723 | $5,446 |
60 | Dave R Johnson | Hager City, WI 54014 | $5,433 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”