Counter Cyclical Program in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 936
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $5,542,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Whispering Silos Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $47,691 |
22 | Bomaz Inc | Hammond, WI 54015 | $46,685 |
23 | Ken Rich Farm Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $46,511 |
24 | R Charles Garbe | Hudson, WI 54016 | $46,098 |
25 | Sun Ridge Farm Inc | Hammond, WI 54015 | $43,888 |
26 | Brent Edward Wink | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $42,869 |
27 | Boerdery LLC | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $39,736 |
28 | Goodrich Farms Llp | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $39,394 |
29 | Steve Krumm | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $38,424 |
30 | Lokker Farms Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $38,371 |
31 | Craig J Erlitz | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $38,260 |
32 | Brent Volkert | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $38,250 |
33 | Edward Sontag | Somerset, WI 54025 | $36,421 |
34 | David J Waldroff | Winter, WI 54896 | $35,315 |
35 | Jerry A Hoffman | Downing, WI 54734 | $35,102 |
36 | Crisdhome Farm Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $34,428 |
37 | Dean Mueller | Roberts, WI 54023 | $33,611 |
38 | Vrieze Farms Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $31,306 |
39 | Richard Beer | Hudson, WI 54016 | $31,209 |
40 | Richard Stafsholt | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $30,786 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”