Total Commodity Programs in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Saint Croix County, Wisconsin totaled $336,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stanley Gausman | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $25,865 |
2 | Tellijohn's Dairy, Inc | Emerald, WI 54013 | $10,452 |
3 | Lofty Acres Inc | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $10,452 |
4 | Progressive Dairy Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $10,452 |
5 | Luckwaldt Agriculture Inc | Woodville, WI 54028 | $10,452 |
6 | Jon De Dairy Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $10,452 |
7 | Levendoski Dairy LLC | Clear Lake, WI 54005 | $10,452 |
8 | Haase Dairy Inc | Somerset, WI 54025 | $10,452 |
9 | Van Dyk Farms Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $10,452 |
10 | Dean Wink | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $10,452 |
11 | Goodrich Cylon Dairy LLC | Deer Park, WI 54007 | $10,452 |
12 | Bomaz Inc | Hammond, WI 54015 | $10,452 |
13 | Johnson Dairy Enterprises LLC | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $10,452 |
14 | Nova Registered Holsteins Inc | Baldwin, WI 54002 | $8,909 |
15 | Hoffman Farms | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $7,245 |
16 | Huppert Bros Inc | River Falls, WI 54022 | $7,037 |
17 | Dnd Dairy LLC | Emerald, WI 54013 | $6,565 |
18 | Gerald Frederick | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $6,506 |
19 | Crisdhome Farm Inc | New Richmond, WI 54017 | $5,661 |
20 | Lee Seim | Glenwood City, WI 54013 | $5,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>