Deficiency Payment in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 705
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $1,840,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terry Steuber | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $8,315 |
42 | Echo Y Inc | Loganville, WI 53943 | $8,214 |
43 | Jeffrey A Sprecher | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $7,874 |
44 | Frank Shimniok | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $7,813 |
45 | Richard Bland Lee | Kilmarnock, VA 22482 | $7,597 |
46 | Edward Reimer | Loganville, WI 53943 | $7,549 |
47 | Accola Bacon Acres Ltd | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $7,381 |
48 | Howard G Hartmann | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $7,256 |
49 | L D & R Farms Inc | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $7,163 |
50 | Been Bros Farms Inc | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $7,104 |
51 | Dan Parsons | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $7,048 |
52 | Ronald Dean Markley | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $7,031 |
53 | James F Ind | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $6,971 |
54 | Linus Gilding | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $6,964 |
55 | James Giebel | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $6,931 |
56 | David E Liegel | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $6,924 |
57 | Shirley Lins | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $6,881 |
58 | Roger A Engel | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $6,679 |
59 | David Alt | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $6,560 |
60 | Zech's Grand View Farm Inc | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $6,476 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”