Market Loss Assistance Program in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,549
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $13,874,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hartung Farms | Madison, WI 53717 | $426,492 |
2 | E & M Larsen Farms LLC | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $174,400 |
3 | Kindschi's Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $139,888 |
4 | Edward Reimer | Loganville, WI 53943 | $120,791 |
5 | Hatz Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $119,981 |
6 | New Age Custom Farming LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $96,215 |
7 | Markley Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $93,735 |
8 | Enge Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $89,747 |
9 | Kevin O Enge Living Trust | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $86,972 |
10 | Meadow Lane Farms Inc | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $83,833 |
11 | Lohr Farms LLC | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $82,564 |
12 | Terry Farms Inc | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $81,993 |
13 | Leatherberry Farms | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $81,114 |
14 | Melvin K Lohr | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $80,839 |
15 | Schlieckau Farm, Inc | Loganville, WI 53943 | $78,396 |
16 | Timothy R Leidig | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $76,199 |
17 | Green Farms, Inc | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $74,667 |
18 | Franklin Brander Est | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $73,066 |
19 | Robert V Leidig Est | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $71,436 |
20 | Maize N Bacon Inc | Sauk City, WI 53583 | $69,705 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>