Farm Subsidy information
Waushara County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Waushara County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,107
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Waushara County, Wisconsin totaled $95,808,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Thom Family Revocable Living Trust | Wautoma, WI 54982 | $388,321 |
22 | Kent F Peterson | Wild Rose, WI 54984 | $337,228 |
23 | Lewis Marvin Andersen | Pine River, WI 54965 | $332,382 |
24 | Harry G Erickson | Wild Rose, WI 54984 | $331,631 |
25 | Fenske Farms Inc | Coloma, WI 54930 | $314,100 |
26 | K & K Farms Inc | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $311,148 |
27 | Pine Breeze Dairy LLC | Appleton, WI 54914 | $301,396 |
28 | Mossyridge Enterprises Inc | Pine River, WI 54965 | $290,149 |
29 | Lauer Farms Inc | Almond, WI 54909 | $283,550 |
30 | Golden Sands Ranch Inc | Wild Rose, WI 54984 | $283,264 |
31 | Leland G Brownlow | Wild Rose, WI 54984 | $282,171 |
32 | Allan H Killam | Pine River, WI 54965 | $278,163 |
33 | Lauer Farms Inc | Almond, WI 54909 | $261,513 |
34 | Gary W Detlor | Hancock, WI 54943 | $259,611 |
35 | Galen D Detlor | Hancock, WI 54943 | $259,056 |
36 | Delores Killam | Pine River, WI 54965 | $256,653 |
37 | Stephan F Krentz | Berlin, WI 54923 | $254,865 |
38 | Robert L Daye | Wautoma, WI 54982 | $249,807 |
39 | Walter A Wouts | Poy Sippi, WI 54967 | $245,840 |
40 | Ponderosa Partnership | Berlin, WI 54923 | $236,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”