Total Commodity Programs in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 553
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 1st District of Alabama (Rep. Bradley Byrne) totaled $12,052,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $558,856 |
2 | Woerner Farms LLC | Foley, AL 36536 | $500,000 |
3 | Petelinski Brothers | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $466,152 |
4 | Cleverdon Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $460,306 |
5 | James Lipscomb & Sons Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $425,831 |
6 | Sirmon Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $402,928 |
7 | 4 M Family Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $370,386 |
8 | Mullek Farms | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $337,353 |
9 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $305,691 |
10 | Riebeling Farms Inc | Foley, AL 36535 | $253,625 |
11 | Blackwater Turf LLC | Elberta, AL 36530 | $250,000 |
12 | Woerner Agribusiness LLC | Foley, AL 36535 | $250,000 |
13 | Dorland Farms | Orange Beach, AL 36561 | $220,869 |
14 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Portageville, MO 63873 | $215,490 |
15 | South Land Sod LLC | Robertsdale, AL 36567 | $190,902 |
16 | Thornburg Farms | Wilmer, AL 36587 | $177,988 |
17 | Driskell Turf Farm | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $174,338 |
18 | Seward Farms | Lucedale, MS 39452 | $159,016 |
19 | John D Bitto | Elberta, AL 36530 | $158,778 |
20 | Julio Corte III Farms | Daphne, AL 36526 | $157,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>