Total Conservation Programs in 3rd District of Alabama (Rep. Mike Rogers), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 563
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 3rd District of Alabama (Rep. Mike Rogers) totaled $6,158,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Willow Run Farm | Opelika, AL 36804 | $36,022 |
42 | Benny L Gullatt | Salem, AL 36874 | $35,012 |
43 | Mann Holdings LLC | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $34,362 |
44 | Bill Adams | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $33,854 |
45 | Barbara W Whatley | Tuskegee, AL 36083 | $33,054 |
46 | Michael Andress | Valley, AL 36854 | $31,731 |
47 | Harmon Farms Inc | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $31,539 |
48 | Peggy Delbridge | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $31,451 |
49 | Barbara Little Priester | Opelika, AL 36801 | $31,426 |
50 | Jack Simpson | Newell, AL 36280 | $30,900 |
51 | Torbert Farms LLC | Opelika, AL 36803 | $30,884 |
52 | Conrad Harmon - Le | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $29,683 |
53 | Elizabeth Andress | Valley, AL 36854 | $29,266 |
54 | Fred Kendrick | Lafayette, AL 36862 | $29,014 |
55 | Ruth P Spencer | Auburn, AL 36831 | $28,690 |
56 | T W Collier Estate | Auburn, AL 36832 | $27,848 |
57 | Grace Collier | Loachapoka, AL 36865 | $27,512 |
58 | Robert H Winstead | Miami, FL 33129 | $26,073 |
59 | Bobby Charles Davis | Tallapoosa, GA 30176 | $25,650 |
60 | Abbotsford Wildlife Foundation | Dalton, GA 30722 | $25,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”