Total Conservation Programs in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 183
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 7th District of Alabama (Rep. Terri Sewell) totaled $622,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Margaret H Moorer | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $7,639 |
22 | Miller Family Limited Partnership | Linden, AL 36748 | $7,582 |
23 | Joseph R Pearce | Gallion, AL 36742 | $6,955 |
24 | Dan D Campbell | Livingston, AL 35470 | $6,820 |
25 | James David Hawkins | Nashville, TN 37204 | $6,743 |
26 | Thomas Abner Hawkins Jr | Hendersonville, TN 37075 | $6,743 |
27 | Jeff Mcclure | Aliceville, AL 35442 | $6,699 |
28 | Tom Lavender | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $6,530 |
29 | Bertram Jenkins | Columbus, MS 39705 | $6,369 |
30 | Slopes Plantation LLC | Huntsville, AL 35801 | $6,358 |
31 | Arthur R Taylor Jr | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $6,261 |
32 | Zodie E Fisher | Germantown, TN 38139 | $5,755 |
33 | Theresa O Ballard | Eutaw, AL 35462 | $5,041 |
34 | W Myles Mayberry Jr | Demopolis, AL 36732 | $5,011 |
35 | Rogers Family LLC | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $4,894 |
36 | Esther R Mccarter | Forkland, AL 36740 | $4,735 |
37 | Arthur Godwin | Gallion, AL 36742 | $4,733 |
38 | Donald J Ward | Livingston, AL 35470 | $4,600 |
39 | Sara C Buck | Emelle, AL 35459 | $4,547 |
40 | Cedar Ridge Ranch LLC | Eutaw, AL 35462 | $4,462 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”