Production Flexibility Program in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 18,916
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $927,378,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $1,147,301 |
22 | Six Way Farms Ptnrs | Weiner, AR 72479 | $1,144,171 |
23 | Carnathan Group | Lexa, AR 72355 | $1,127,457 |
24 | Ashton Farms A Partnership | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $1,112,398 |
25 | Clover Bend Fms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $1,101,053 |
26 | King Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $1,084,665 |
27 | Coleman Farms Ptr | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $1,079,885 |
28 | Jeff Gilbrech & Company | Holly Grove, AR 72069 | $1,072,635 |
29 | Long Lake Plantation | Helena, AR 72342 | $1,071,262 |
30 | Smith Bros Farms Partnership | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $1,052,315 |
31 | Gammill Farms | Tyronza, AR 72386 | $1,044,839 |
32 | Walter Lockley & Sons | Cherry Valley, AR 72324 | $1,018,570 |
33 | Penndale Farms Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $1,015,310 |
34 | Rainbow Farms II Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $1,000,150 |
35 | Voyles Farms | Parkin, AR 72373 | $980,110 |
36 | Zanone Plantation | Horseshoe Lake, AR 72348 | $936,273 |
37 | Wampler Farms Ptnr | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $927,114 |
38 | Heritage Farms A General Partners | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $916,492 |
39 | Current River Farms | Corning, AR 72422 | $896,666 |
40 | Crawford Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $892,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”