Total Conservation Programs in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 6,229

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 1st District of Arkansas (Rep. Rick Crawford) totaled $122,481,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21D D WolbrechtMemphis, TN 38120$430,915
22Crain CompanyMemphis, TN 38177$425,528
23Futrell ButlerRector, AR 72461$422,049
24Kenneth Billie Phillips Rev TrustJonesboro, AR 72401$420,230
25Clifford Douglas Weigel Revocable TrustAlbuquerque, NM 87199$411,056
26Dixie Break LLCMemphis, TN 38117$394,042
27Dean Family Farm Limited PartnerhsipNorth Little Rock, AR 72116$393,018
28E H Y Farms IncMemphis, TN 38137$379,952
29L L Cole & Son IncCotton Plant, AR 72036$375,478
30Portis Joint Venture Limited PartLepanto, AR 72354$364,522
31John HortonForrest City, AR 72335$363,015
32William P WellsMemphis, TN 38137$343,793
33Velius SimpsonRector, AR 72461$339,536
34Richard E DouglasWynne, AR 72396$336,695
35Thomas Calvin Wells JrMemphis, TN 38137$334,340
36Robert J Haralson JrAugusta, AR 72006$333,507
37Curtis-curtis And Vi Floyd CrispElaine, AR 72333$331,130
38William Joe Moore And Jane Allen Moore TrustMemphis, TN 38138$328,729
39Wells Investments, LpMemphis, TN 38137$326,879
40Mary L Smart Irrevocable TrustSuccess, AR 72470$324,536

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag