Lamb Meat Adjustment Program in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 72
Recipients of Lamb Meat Adjustment Program from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Lamb Meat Adjustment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sutfin Land & Livestock Inc | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $720 |
42 | Robert H Thompson | Bieber, CA 96009 | $689 |
43 | Ann C Lusk | Bieber, CA 96009 | $594 |
44 | Mark Lanzi | Oak Run, CA 96069 | $465 |
45 | Nathan Bennett | Alturas, CA 96101 | $429 |
46 | Leah Lorraine Carpenter | Eagleville, CA 96110 | $396 |
47 | Frank F Diaz | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $378 |
48 | Terry Allen Adams Jr | Corning, CA 96021 | $378 |
49 | Raymond L Verdun | Corning, CA 96021 | $358 |
50 | John Rohr | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $317 |
51 | Wesley Cook | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $300 |
52 | Stephen Schmitz | Gerber, CA 96035 | $288 |
53 | Alissa L Fee | Fort Bidwell, CA 96112 | $247 |
54 | James M Colbert | Alturas, CA 96101 | $231 |
55 | Chris Goniea | Corning, CA 96021 | $216 |
56 | Sandra Parriott | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $216 |
57 | Jerrold Meeder | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $198 |
58 | Lettie J Canavan | Cottonwood, CA 96022 | $183 |
59 | William Stevenson | Cedarville, CA 96104 | $180 |
60 | Lawrence W Petford | Alturas, CA 96101 | $177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”