Total Commodity Programs in 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 78
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock) totaled $593,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Elgin R Bowers | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $3,088 |
42 | John Brownlie | Jackson, CA 95642 | $3,031 |
43 | Gail Lynne Hahn | Shingle Springs, CA 95682 | $2,948 |
44 | F & J Oneto Ranch Lp | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $2,753 |
45 | Tim Bordges | Shingle Springs, CA 95682 | $2,578 |
46 | Lyman Vineyards Inc | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $2,530 |
47 | David Bassett | Jackson, CA 95642 | $2,483 |
48 | Katherine Vandermeulen | Jackson, CA 95642 | $2,120 |
49 | John Kirkpatrick & Sons | Jackson, CA 95642 | $2,015 |
50 | Villegas Family Trust Dated March 2001 | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $1,911 |
51 | Joseph Harralson | Mount Aukum, CA 95656 | $1,905 |
52 | Larry Baumann | Mount Aukum, CA 95656 | $1,905 |
53 | Bobbi Coughlin | Sutter Creek, CA 95685 | $1,904 |
54 | Donald J Swett | Jackson, CA 95642 | $1,773 |
55 | Jessica Clarice Arditto | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $1,650 |
56 | Ronald Ohm | Clements, CA 95227 | $1,590 |
57 | Betty Harvey | Potter Valley, CA 95469 | $1,462 |
58 | Ted W Cooper | Shingle Springs, CA 95682 | $1,408 |
59 | Raffetto Enterprises | Placerville, CA 95667 | $1,142 |
60 | Paul David Gianandrea | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $1,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”