Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Colorado
(Rep. Scott Tipton)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 12,781
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $633,402,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch Ent | Towaoc, CO 81334 | $5,170,063 |
| 2 | Ute Mountain Tribe | Towaoc, CO 81334 | $5,090,943 |
| 3 | Raftopoulos Brothers Livestock | Craig, CO 81625 | $4,596,295 |
| 4 | Wilton Earle & Sons | Craig, CO 81625 | $4,471,041 |
| 5 | Guynes Farm Partnership | Dove Creek, CO 81324 | $2,863,591 |
| 6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $2,594,734 |
| 7 | Nottingham Land & Livestock Lllp | Craig, CO 81626 | $2,574,417 |
| 8 | Harry Kourlis Ranch | Englewood, CO 80113 | $2,153,568 |
| 9 | Martinez Farms LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $1,667,346 |
| 10 | Tuttle Livestock | Craig, CO 81626 | $1,662,350 |
| 11 | Pro-seed Inc | Center, CO 81125 | $1,652,036 |
| 12 | Bret Grandbouche | Craig, CO 81625 | $1,648,154 |
| 13 | Tracy S Kester | Blanca, CO 81123 | $1,607,126 |
| 14 | Price Farms LLC | Center, CO 81125 | $1,605,705 |
| 15 | Mitchell Ag Production Flp | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $1,556,774 |
| 16 | Hulteen Orchards Inc | Austin, CO 81410 | $1,533,216 |
| 17 | Zapata Seed Company | Hooper, CO 81136 | $1,494,791 |
| 18 | Van Treese Farms Inc | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $1,473,781 |
| 19 | Steve Chappell | Cortez, CO 81321 | $1,470,689 |
| 20 | Alexandra Butler | Craig, CO 81626 | $1,456,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf