Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 151
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $554,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $48,376 |
2 | Bass Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $21,150 |
3 | Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $21,065 |
4 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $18,441 |
5 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $17,478 |
6 | St Jean Jolin Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $16,719 |
7 | Ranlom Dairy Farm | Ashford, CT 06278 | $15,546 |
8 | Robert C Peckham | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $14,881 |
9 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $14,743 |
10 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $12,146 |
11 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $11,832 |
12 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $11,253 |
13 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $9,288 |
14 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $9,207 |
15 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $9,092 |
16 | Maegog Farms LLC | Salem, CT 06420 | $8,906 |
17 | Williams Robert G & Donald R | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $8,505 |
18 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $8,433 |
19 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $8,333 |
20 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $7,961 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>