Total Conservation Programs in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,044
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $3,887,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Andrew J Mcmath | Dawson, GA 39842 | $14,439 |
42 | Martha Toy Fountain | Exeter, NH 03833 | $14,339 |
43 | Matthew W Lowe | Atlanta, GA 30339 | $14,327 |
44 | Shirley Durham | Bluffton, GA 39824 | $14,247 |
45 | B & T Farms LLC | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $13,958 |
46 | John Walter Law Sr | Dawson, GA 39842 | $13,489 |
47 | E H Giles | Blakely, GA 39823 | $13,194 |
48 | Story Family Partnership Lllp | Americus, GA 31709 | $13,038 |
49 | Bernice S Wiley | Smithville, GA 31787 | $12,937 |
50 | Eric J Collier As Trustee Of The Eric J Collier An | Dallas, GA 30132 | $12,880 |
51 | Kaylor Tree Farm LLC | New Smyrna Beach, FL 32169 | $12,677 |
52 | Boundary Woods LLC | Thomasville, GA 31799 | $12,641 |
53 | Willowbrooke Farm LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $12,426 |
54 | Shannon Akin | Vienna, GA 31092 | $12,387 |
55 | Mary Virginia Crisp | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $12,197 |
56 | Visser Farm Inc | Dawson, GA 39842 | $12,189 |
57 | Cathy F Taliaferro | Eastpoint, FL 32328 | $11,990 |
58 | Mcdowell Farms Inc | Greer, SC 29650 | $11,950 |
59 | Don E Bridges | Dawson, GA 39842 | $11,855 |
60 | Nika Properties LLC | Vienna, GA 31092 | $11,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”