Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Georgia
(Rep. Sanford Bishop)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,103
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Georgia (Rep. Sanford Bishop) totaled $98,184,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $8,761,439 |
| 2 | Southwest Georgia Farm Credit ** | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $4,420,347 |
| 3 | P G C Farms | Brinson, GA 39825 | $2,241,658 |
| 4 | Bank Of Dawson ** | Dawson, GA 39842 | $2,058,762 |
| 5 | Ameris Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36303 | $1,350,518 |
| 6 | Citizens Bank Of Americus ** | Richland, GA 31825 | $1,258,697 |
| 7 | Peoples South Bank ** | Greenwood, FL 32443 | $1,183,199 |
| 8 | Servisfirst Bank ** | Dothan, AL 36302 | $1,115,385 |
| 9 | Heard Family Farm | Brinson, GA 39825 | $982,467 |
| 10 | The Bank Of Edison ** | Edison, GA 39846 | $977,266 |
| 11 | First Port City Bank ** | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $789,658 |
| 12 | Bank Of Terrell ** | Dawson, GA 39842 | $763,886 |
| 13 | 3rt Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $745,459 |
| 14 | Sauls Partnership | Shellman, GA 39886 | $733,573 |
| 15 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $686,125 |
| 16 | John Bridges Farm Gp | Brinson, GA 39825 | $678,938 |
| 17 | Minor Brothers Farm Partnership | Andersonville, GA 31711 | $631,980 |
| 18 | S N L Farms | Blakely, GA 39823 | $620,951 |
| 19 | Cedar Head Farms A General Partnership | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $619,885 |
| 20 | Clay Mcdaniel Farms | Newton, GA 39870 | $614,706 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf