Farm Subsidy information
2nd District of Hawaii
(Rep. Tulsi Gabbard)
Total Subsidies in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 667
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $11,443,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Flowers By Kona Scent Da Smallest LLC | Ocean View, HI 96737 | $86,839 |
42 | Gomes Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $86,657 |
43 | Kona Hills Coffee LLC | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $84,759 |
44 | Patrick Daniel Lau | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $82,562 |
45 | Palekoki Ranch Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $78,460 |
46 | Roger Y Uchima | Honomu, HI 96728 | $75,033 |
47 | William J Sanchez | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $73,394 |
48 | Emilio B Tadeo | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $73,382 |
49 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $73,113 |
50 | Stephen De Luz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $71,782 |
51 | Jerry M Julian | Pahoa, HI 96778 | $71,753 |
52 | Agee Inc | Ninole, HI 96773 | $70,791 |
53 | Kohala Kentia Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $66,019 |
54 | Loe Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $65,736 |
55 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $65,595 |
56 | Alohilani Orchids Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $61,620 |
57 | Billy Andrade Ranch LLC | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $61,412 |
58 | Tara Cronin | Captain Cook, HI 96704 | $61,279 |
59 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $61,112 |
60 | Medeiros Farm Inc | Kalaheo, HI 96741 | $60,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”